October 4,
2004
BOARD OF FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
The Board of Commissioners met in a regular session
with Chairman John E. Taylor and Commissioners Fred E. Ferguson, Donald C. Hay and
Donald E. Waymire present.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Taylor
at
8:30.
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
Ronald Spencer to rezone approximately 3.6 acres from A-1 to R-3A and to rezone
approximately 36.4 acres from A-1 to A-2.
The purpose for the rezoning is to sell off tract. The property is located at the intersection
of
Rock Creek Rd. and Ohio Terr. on the South
side of
Rock Creek Rd. on the West side of Ohio
Terr. Larry stated that the Planning
Commission recommended approval.
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Waymire
seconded to approve Resolution No. 04-84 approving the rezoning of
approximately 3.6 acres from A-1 to R-3A and to rezone approximately 36.4 acres
from A-1 to A-2 owned by Ronald E. Spencer and located in Section 27, Township
17, Range 20. All voted “yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
David Wharton to rezone approximately 3.5 acres from A-1 to R-3A. The property is located near the intersection
of
Cloud Rd. and
Ohio Rd. on the West side of
Ohio Rd. South of
Cloud Rd. The purpose for the rezoning is to sell tract
and home. Larry stated the Planning
Commission recommended approval.
Commissioner Waymire moved and Commissioner Hay
seconded to approve Resolution No. 04-85 approving the rezoning of
approximately 3.5 acres from A-1 to R-3A owned by David Wharton and located in
Section 4, Township 19, Range 20. All
voted “yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
Frank Fogle, Jr. and owned by Fogle Rentals, LLC to rezone approximately 317.1
acres from I-1 to A-1. The potential
buyer would operate a commercial nursery.
The zoning change is required to avoid a conflict with the State of
Kansas regarding using the water
from the quarry for irrigation of the nursery.
The property is located North of Labette Rd. (23rd St.) and East of Montana
Rd. Larry stated that no comments for or
against the proposed rezoning were received by the Planning Department and a
representative from the City of Ottawa stated that the City Planning Commissioner
and the City Commissioners supported the rezoning. Larry said that the Planning Commission
recommended approval.
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Ferguson
seconded to approve Resolution No. 04-86 approving the rezoning of
approximately 317.1 acres from I-1 to A-1 owned by Fogle Rentals, LLC and
located in Section 12, Township 17, Range 19.
All voted “yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
Florence Gamet, Trust to rezone approximately 70 acres from A-1 to A-2. The purpose for the rezoning is to permit the
split into one 30 acre tract and two 20 acre tracts. The property is located near the intersection
of
Georgia Rd. and
Pawnee Rd. Larry stated that four people appeared at the
public hearing opposing the rezoning based on potential increase in traffic and
impacts on narrow County roads and lack of public water. Larry said the Planning Commission
recommended approval. Scott Bird,
representing Florence Gamet Trust said the property lies along
Georgia Rd.
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Ferguson seconded
to approve Resolution 04-87 approving the rezoning of approximately 70 acres
from A-1 to A-2 owned by Florence E. Gamet, Trust and located in Section 22,
Township 16, Range 18. All voted “yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
George Wingert, Jr. to rezone approximately 70.1 acres from A-1 to R-3A. The purpose for the rezoning is to permit the
division to develop a subdivision. The
property is located near the intersection of
Thomas Rd. and
Utah Rd. Larry stated that four people appeared at the
public hearing opposing the rezoning of the entire 70.1 acres at this time
since the applicant did not have a subdivision plat or a design plan. They also voiced concerns regarding water
pressure. Larry said the Planning
Commission recommended approval.
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Ferguson
seconded to approve Resolution No. 04-88 approving the rezoning of approximately
70.1 acres from A-1 to R-3A owned by George Wingert, Jr. and located in Section
29, Township 15, Range 21. All voted
“yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
Midwest Trust Company, Trustee with property owner being Alma Mock, Trust to
rezone approximately 11.35 acres from a 108.4 acre tract from A-1 to R-E. Property is located approximately ¼ mile west
of the intersection of
Nebraska Rd. and Riley Terr. on the South
side of Riley Terr. Larry said the
purpose of the rezoning is for financing purposes. Larry said the Planning Commission
recommended approval.
Commissioner Waymire moved and Commissioner Hay
seconded to approve Resolution No. 04-89 approving the rezoning of
approximately 11.35 acres from A-1 to R-E owned by Alma Mock, Trust and located
in Section 5, Township 16, Range 20. All
voted “yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed rezoning application filed by
John Shepherd to rezone approximately 8.65 acres from A-1 to R-E. The property is located between Jackson and
Rock Creek Roads on the West side of
Colorado Rd. Larry said the purpose is to finance the
construction of the new residence. Larry
said the Planning Commission recommended approval.
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Ferguson
seconded to approve Resolution No. 04-90 approving the rezoning of
approximately 8.65 acres from A-1 to R-E owned by John Shepherd and located in Section
29, Township 17, Range 18. All voted
“yes.”
Larry Walrod discussed special use permit
application filed by Ron West for a Paintball Facility at
1008 Rock Creek Rd. located within an A-1
zoning. Larry stated this matter came
before the Planning Commission on July 22,
2004
and they voted 7-2 to deny the permit.
This permit came to the
County
Commissioners on August
9, 2004
and was continued until the August 11 meeting to permit the Commissioners to
examine the road conditions, the intended play area, relationship of the
proposed site to surrounding properties, and potential impacts associated with
the floodplain. The Commissioners on
August 11 agreed to refer the application and additional information that had
been received back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. On September 16 the Planning Commission voted
4-3 (4 voting to send it back as previously recommended and 3 voting to
reconsider the application and 2 were absent).
Larry said the Commissioners could adopt a resolution denying the
Special Use Permit with a statement of the findings for denial or adopt a
resolution for approval of the Special Use Permit including findings for
approval and subject to the eight conditions as recommended. The eight conditions are as follows: 1) The
Special Use Permit is granted for the paintball facility. Any additional uses will require approval of
an amended Special Use Permit. 2) That the applicant shall maintain liability
insurance in the amount of at least $1,000,000. 3) That the parking area and
access drive be improved with an all weather surface prior to any paintball
activities being conducted. 4) Any sign(s) used in conjunction with this
Special Use Permit shall conform to the Franklin County Zoning Regulations. 5)
That there shall be no alcoholic beverage sold or consumed in connection with
the operation of the paintball activities. 6) On-site sanitation facilities
shall be provided and properly maintained at all times. 7) No overnight camping
shall be permitted. 8) That the Special Use Permit shall be null and void by
operation of law if the Special Use Permit has not been initiated and utilized
by commencing the activity or use at the site specified in said permit within
one year of the date of approval.
Commissioner Hay asked if a johnny on the spot was acceptable for
sanitation and Larry said yes.
Commissioner Hay asked if rock drive way and parking was an all weather
surface and Larry said yes. Commissioner
Hay asked Ron West if he had any problems with any of the eight conditions that
are proposed for the facility. Ron West
stated he had no problems with the eight conditions.
John Richeson said he is representing Bill &
Darlene Lister, Brian & Gwen Hartman, Leonard & Linda Robbins, Sandy
& Mel Edmonds, Leona Morgan and Lawton Boyer, Lloyd & Luella Stiffer
and Arlene Quinsy and additional neighbors in support of denying the Special
Use Permit are Larry & Alberta Smith, Don Payne, Robert & Tamar Coop
man, Kevin & Debbie Brewer, Doug Morgan and Scott Yeargain.
Bill Lister of
1015 Jackson Rd. they have had 4 Commission
meetings and 2 Planning Commission meeting and they is a very strong vote
against the Special Use Permit.
Neighbors are against it overwhelmingly.
Gwen Hartman 910
Jackson Rd. she considers her valley
the most prime hunting ground around and she doesn’t appreciate having a
paintball facility there. She is very
much against it and will do everything in her power to stop it. Chairman Taylor asked Ms. Hartman if they
could hear the paintball guns and she said they hear them all of the time and
she does not appreciate it.
Scott Yeargain of
2263 Nevada Rd. is not in favor of the
Special Use Permit. A lot of people work
and save money to move to the country for a quiet place and paintball guns are
not quiet. You can not compare a
paintball facility special use permit to a special use permit for a bed and
breakfast. They are apples and
oranges. Mr. Yeargain thinks it is bad
aiming a gun of any kind at another person.
Mr. Yeargain urged the Commissioners to vote no on the special use
permit.
Darlene Lister of
1015 Jackson Rd. said they can be inside of
their home with the television on and the air conditioner running and it sounds
like the guns are right outside of the door.
Doug Morgan of
3921 Florida Rd. said that the majority
should rule and a majority of the people does not want this paintball
facility. Doug said there is not trustworthiness
of the individual that is doing this.
Doug said he went to the Appraiser’s Office and the mobile home on the
property has not had taxes paid on it for at least two years. Doug said he tried to put a mobile home on
some property with another residence and was told there could not be two
residences on one tract of property.
Doug said it was his understanding that a mobile home can not be used
for storage or an office that it is designed for a residence.
Leona Morgan of
1052 Rock Creek Rd. said they can always hear
the paintballs, the traffic on the hilly roads is very dangerous.
Luella Stiffler of
1015 Rock Creek Rd. asked why this is not a
commercial permit. Chairman Taylor said
that with commercial zoning it allows a lot more things to be done and with a
special use permit you can only do what the permit allows. Luella asked if the special use is violated
who investigates it and who determines if it is violated and what is done if it
is violated. Chairman Taylor said the
permit can be taken away and the Planning Department would investigate it. Larry Walrod said that violations of a
special use permit go to the Planning Commission and a letter is set out to
correct the violations.
Roy Dunn of
2817 Stafford Rd. said that a rock quarry out
by him has a special use permit and they are usually up for renewal.
Roy urged the Commission to go
with the Planning Commission and deny the paintball facility.
Lloyd Stiffler of
1015 Rock Creek Rd. said that the creek runs
through his property and that is his means of water for his cattle. He asked who was going to take care of the
johnney on the jobs when they get tipped over and who was going to go and use
it when they are already in the middle of the woods. The noise comes right down the creek bed and
they are very loud. The Board needs to
do their job and vote it down.
John Richeson said the Board should follow the
Golden rules (Golden vs. City of
Overland Park). The Supreme Court set out several factors
which should be considered by the Board and which would aid all interested
parties in determining the reasonableness and validity of zoning
determinations. Those factors are: 1)
The character of the neighborhood, 2) The zoning and uses of properties nearby,
3) The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been
restricted, 4) The extent to which removal of the restrictions will
detrimentally affect nearby property, 5) The length of time the subject
property has remained vacant as zoned, 6) The relative gain to the public
health, safety, and welfare by the destruction of the value of surrounding
property as compared to the hardship imposed on the applicant for rezoning and
7 & 8) The recommendations of permanent or professional staff, and the
conformance of the requested change to the adopted or recognized master plan
being utilized by the county. Mr.
Richeson said the Board must comply with the directives of the case and make
detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law to support the ultimate
decision. Mr. Richeson said the
conditions must protect the over-all objective of protecting health, safety and
general welfare and the Board must consider 1) Whether the proposed use will
destroy the aesthetics of the surrounding development in order to protect the
character of the neighborhood, 2) Whether the proposed use will result in
increasing the amount of vehicular traffic to the point where it exceeds the
capacity of the road network to accommodate it, 3) Whether the proposed use is
reasonable necessary for the convenience and welfare of the public and will not
substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjoining property,
4) Whether noise, vibration, dust or lighting that would normally be associated
with such use is of such duration and intensity as to be objectionable to
adjacent property, 5) Whether the proposed use will pollute the air or water,
6) Whether the use would destroy an irreplaceable natural resource, 7) Whether
the construction activities or quality of maintenance associated with the use
would cause excessive erosion and 8) Whether the proposed use would result in
overcrowding of land or cause an undue concentration of population. Once the conditions have been set the Board
should require the applicant to sign an agreement which could be enforceable by
parties in the neighborhood, otherwise neighbors would have no direct remedy
for non-compliance. Mr. Richeson asked
the Board not to grant the special use permit.
All of these folks that live around it don’t want it, so why grant
it.
Ron West of
1008 Rock Creek Rd. said they have been playing
paintball for 6 months and has not had any complaints about noise or traffic. Mr. West said he can not hear the paintball
guns in his house with the windows open.
Gwen Hartman said he was lying and was absurd. Mr. West said the johnney on the jobs would
be serviced once a week. Mr. West said
he could not stop people from urinating in the woods, but even if 30 people
urinated in the woods it would not add up to what cattle do. The parking would be large enough to handle
30 vehicles, business hours would be during light hours, there would not be any
lights installed. During the winter when
it is cold, paintball guns will not work.
Boundaries would be marked and referees would be on the playing field at
all times. Chairman Taylor asked in the
past when they have had these activities how many people have been there
playing. Mr. West said between 25 and 30
people. Commissioner Hay asked if
something could be done with the visibility leaving the driveway, could he cut
the trees and grass. Mr. West said that
would not be a problem.
Commissioner Waymire moved and Commissioner Ferguson
seconded to go into an executive session for 5 minutes at 10:05 for attorney client
privileges with Board and Blaine Finch present.
All voted “yes.” Chairman Taylor
opened the meeting at
10:10 and reported no action
taken, no decisions made.
Chairman Taylor asked Blaine Finch and Larry Walrod
to redraft a resolution including more conditions such as hours of operation,
sanitation issues, how the course would be marked, site distance when leaving
the property onto the county road, the use of old tires, restrict 4-wheeler use
and provide a legal description for the paintball facility. Board set on the agenda for October 11th
at
8:30 to consider the special use permit for the
paintball facility including more conditions.
John Coen introduced four kids from 4-H that was
part of a group that went to
Washington this past summer for 10 days
as part of a Citizenship Program.
Shelby Sobba said that they also had the opportunity
to go to
New York for a 6 hour tour.
They went to ground zero and took in a Broadway show.
Shelby said that it was a big
cultural shock and a good experience.
Chelsey Coen discussed the preparation for the trip,
they did a lot of bonding, including funding raising to get the money to
go. They meet people from all over. They
toured the Pentagon, Memorials and the White House.
Aaron Douglas said in Washington they took part in
sessions and learned how the government in DC works, learned how to pass a
bill, they took part in a mock Congress meeting, where they had a House and Senate
and played sports.
John Coen said that Eric Anderson of
Ottawa was elected president of the
mock Senate
Billy Harris said they bonded with the 52
individuals as one family, making a lot of friends.
Jo Ellen Arnold said there is about 350 kids involved
in 4-H in
Franklin
County. This is National 4-H week and the goal is the
4-H grows.
Kristie Stinebaugh discussed the
2005 United Way Campaign. Board agreed to enclose flyers with pay
checks describing the services provided by the
Franklin County United Way and offer incentives to
employees that participate.
Kristie Stinebaugh discussed a benefit that
Commercial Federal is offering to employees that bank with them. The program is called Bank at Work and is of
no cost to the county. It offers free
and discounted banking services. Board
agreed not to enclose flyers and offer the benefits, since all local banks
don’t offer the service.
Commissioner Waymire moved and Commissioner Hay
seconded to approve payroll changes 04-340 for John Niccum, 04-342 for Roger
Higbie and 04-343 for Mike Nicholas all with Public Works. All voted “yes.”
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Waymire
seconded to approve the minutes for September 29,
2004. All voted “yes.”
Shari Perry read a letter from Anderson County
Commission regarding the paving of the Franklin/Anderson County line road
between US59 and K-31.
Anderson
County stated that they have other
areas of the county they need to concentrate their resources on at this
time. Therefore they are unable to assist
in this project.
Blaine Finch discussed a letter he received from
Miami
County regarding the upgrade of the
radio repeater. Board agreed to ask
Wellsville City Fire,
Miami
County and
Franklin
Township to split the cost of the
upgrade.
Commissioner Hay moved and Commissioner Ferguson
seconded to appoint Max Flager to the unexpired term of Pomona Township
Trustee. All voted “yes.”
With no further discussion the meeting was adjourned
at
12:00.
_______________________________ _____________________________________
Clerk Chairman